EC Survival land
Home › Forums › Survival › General discussion › EC Survival land
This topic contains 14 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by Psycho9 10 years, 9 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
So I checked out the EC survival dynamic map. All I saw was around 70%-80%
of the land was claimed. So I thought about it:Will EC ever create more land for EC Survival?If so, when will this happen?How much land will be given?
~DarkDelta
I herd from skills awile ago that they might make a 2nd survival server.. idk if this is still accurate.
Hopefully they keep extending bit by bit since I’d have to agree with you on that DarkDelta. However I wish also that the wild world is updated a bit more frequently since that is the prime place for items at the moment.
There is still enough land for you to build ur town on.
takoballball: Not as much as you think, sooner or later you will barely have a chance to start a town and will only have the choice of joining one.
This is something I’ve thought about for a while, the main problem is the towns that are inactive.
The ease of getting gold with automatic farms in the past months has made all these little towns appear, the owners log on for 2 or 3 days, build a town, put a kajillion dollars in the bank to keep it active forever and then never play again. These ones have no good builds in them and should be edited back to wilderness and abandoned after a month of inactivity.
Then there’s the super-massive towns that have become inactive over time (I live in one) these should not be destroyed, as much hard work has been put into them. I was thinking maybe we could have like a museum server where the good towns go, but then it probably wouldn’t get much traffic, and a server that no one can really do anything on is kind of a waste of hardware.
Heh, maybe move the massive towns to the end, plenty of space there.
ADCKnight: Yea exactly but then again it will be a struggle to clean up all the towns leftovers.
We need changes….
I have been flirting with the idea of expanding the world. I would have to make a test by expanding it and see how the server behaves. If the expansion generates lag I would have to retract it back. Im just trying to figure out a way people can explore that area without building/town making permission. Another thing is that we could make a 2nd survival server, I have the system set up so people can use a backpack to get stuff from one server to the other, what do you guys think?
What I think of making more spaces is not a good idea. And the best thing to make more lands is to make upkeeps more expensive, which is confusing since members want more lands, but when the mods made it more expensive, THERE WERE RIOTS!
borncorp: I’d be fine with it as long as it doesn’t create lag for the server, I’m completely for the idea.
If I get any spare time after work, I’ll fly around the map to get a list of towns that are abandoned, specifically ones that never got sponged during the previous wilderness wipe yet are still claimed, I think I’ve seen two or three at least. Considering that no one has complained about those towns already being wiped, might as well get admin to force abandon them anyway, to free up some land.
Thanks ADCKnight! Now if they could make the inactive town land back to natural.
Cant do much for abandoned town unless like adck says the town has been wiped as it wasnt sponged. If the town has tons of building like inksacville then can’t really clear it cause the mayor might have placed tons of money in there and maybe returning some time later but when he returns and asks where the town is at, are you gonna answer for it?
I think there should be a limit on the amount of towns in the server, There are just way too many and not enough people.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.