Minecraft 1.9 Snapshots released :D

[DragonEngineerParticipant]

If 2 things that look the same but the things are different things, they are still different things, despite looking like the same thing, which is an element of that thing.

Let ‘U’ be a universal set of forum topics.
Let Set A be forum topics about moderator applications.
Let Set B be forum topics about reports.

U = { 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 }
Imagine there are 10 forum topics in this whole website

If A = { 1,2,3,4,5,6 }
Then B = { 7,8,9,10 }
Because when a topic is on moderator applications, it cannot be a report. This is a mutually exclusive event.

aka A -> B (A implies B)
Logic gates for IMPLIES Gate
T -> T is T
T -> F is F
F -> T is T
F -> F is T

So let us focus on Set A
A = { 1,2,3,4,5,6 }

If Topic 1 is by Ender243, and Ender243’s application failed. Some months later, he applied again, as Topic 2.

They are the same type of topic, but then content is different. So they will have the same purpose, despite one named “Topic 1” and another named “Topic 2”.

Another example:
Let say Player X posted a report in the moderator application section, with contents being a moderator application and topic “Report on Player Y”.
The later made a moderator application under the correct section with correct content.

Those 2 topics look the same, yet they have different purpose. One being really apply for moderators and another just getting “Vote down”.

So by logic:
Topics can look the same, but different purpose.

My critical thinking is very good 😀

[cookie_monst3rParticipant Karma: 2 pts]

melee i really dont think any of us care about that conference or whatever it is, if we did we would have looked at it the first time you said something about it.. theres no need to post that

[Author]

Posts